A government-backed meal delivery service for people on Medicaid and Medicare is getting national attention — but not all of it is positive. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently praised Mom’s Meals, a company that sends prepackaged meals to people who are older or living with illnesses like cancer or diabetes, the Associated Press reported. “This is really one of the solutions for making our country healthy again,” Kennedy said in a video posted on X. He toured the company’s Oklahoma facility last week and thanked them for providing meals “without additives.” But experts say that’s not entirely true. An Associated Press investigation found that many of Mom’s Meals’ offerings are highly processed and contain ingredients that wouldn’t be found in a home kitchen. Marion Nestle, a nutrition expert at New York University, reviewed the menu, including nutrition labels and ingredients. Some meals — like chicken bacon ranch pasta or French toast sticks with ham — were high in salt, sugar or saturated fat, Nestle said. “It is perfectly possible to make meals like this with real foods and no ultra-processing additives but every one of the meals I looked at is loaded with such additives,” she said. “What’s so sad is that they don’t have to be this way,” Nestle added. “Other companies are able to produce much better products, but of course…  read on >  read on >

A government-backed meal delivery service for people on Medicaid and Medicare is getting national attention — but not all of it is positive. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently praised Mom’s Meals, a company that sends prepackaged meals to people who are older or living with illnesses like cancer or diabetes, the Associated Press reported. “This is really one of the solutions for making our country healthy again,” Kennedy said in a video posted on X. He toured the company’s Oklahoma facility last week and thanked them for providing meals “without additives.” But experts say that’s not entirely true. An Associated Press investigation found that many of Mom’s Meals’ offerings are highly processed and contain ingredients that wouldn’t be found in a home kitchen. Marion Nestle, a nutrition expert at New York University, reviewed the menu, including nutrition labels and ingredients. Some meals — like chicken bacon ranch pasta or French toast sticks with ham — were high in salt, sugar or saturated fat, Nestle said. “It is perfectly possible to make meals like this with real foods and no ultra-processing additives but every one of the meals I looked at is loaded with such additives,” she said. “What’s so sad is that they don’t have to be this way,” Nestle added. “Other companies are able to produce much better products, but of course…  read on >  read on >

Alkaline. Electrolyte. Flavored. Walk down the beverage aisle and you’ll find all kinds of waters promising extra health perks. But are these fancy waters really better for you? Not really, Tufts University experts say. “There’s no physiological basis that there’s some metabolic benefit to these specialty waters over just regular, plain old water,” said Roger Fielding, a senior scientist at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts in Boston. For most people, Fielding said the best thing to do is simply drink more fluids — especially since many people walk around mildly dehydrated. “If you have a preference for a beverage and that’s going to make you drink more and you’ll be more attentive to rehydrating with that beverage, and you have the resources to purchase that beverage, well have at it,” Fielding said in a news release. “Just like with sweetened beverages to an extent, if you’re not in excess, you’re more likely to rehydrate because a beverage is sweetened or flavored,” he added. Still, Fielding urged people to check nutrition labels — yes, even on water. Waters labeled with “added electrolytes” may contain added sodium. Adults should aim for less than 2 grams of sodium a day. “If someone consumes large amounts of water with high levels of sodium, they could elevate their risk of hypertension and other…  read on >  read on >

Alkaline. Electrolyte. Flavored. Walk down the beverage aisle and you’ll find all kinds of waters promising extra health perks. But are these fancy waters really better for you? Not really, Tufts University experts say. “There’s no physiological basis that there’s some metabolic benefit to these specialty waters over just regular, plain old water,” said Roger Fielding, a senior scientist at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts in Boston. For most people, Fielding said the best thing to do is simply drink more fluids — especially since many people walk around mildly dehydrated. “If you have a preference for a beverage and that’s going to make you drink more and you’ll be more attentive to rehydrating with that beverage, and you have the resources to purchase that beverage, well have at it,” Fielding said in a news release. “Just like with sweetened beverages to an extent, if you’re not in excess, you’re more likely to rehydrate because a beverage is sweetened or flavored,” he added. Still, Fielding urged people to check nutrition labels — yes, even on water. Waters labeled with “added electrolytes” may contain added sodium. Adults should aim for less than 2 grams of sodium a day. “If someone consumes large amounts of water with high levels of sodium, they could elevate their risk of hypertension and other…  read on >  read on >

Tens of thousands of people suffer needless heart attacks and strokes every year because they aren’t taking cholesterol-lowering drugs, a new study says. More than 39,000 deaths, nearly 100,000 non-fatal heart attacks and up to 65,000 strokes in the U.S. could be prevented if people eligible for statins and other cholesterol-lowering drugs were taking them, researchers reported June 30 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. Nearly half of Americans (47%) who’ve never had a heart attack or stroke are eligible to take statins under U.S. guidelines, researchers found. But fewer than a quarter (23%) of them have been prescribed the life-saving drugs, results show. A substantial number of heart attack or stroke survivors also aren’t taking the drugs, even though all are eligible for them under U.S. guidelines, researchers said. “These results add to a growing body of evidence that there are important shortcomings in the quality of care for common and costly chronic diseases such as high cholesterol, and that addressing those shortcomings would yield major public health benefits,” lead researcher Dr. Caleb Alexander, a professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in a news release. For the study, researchers analyzed data from nearly 5,000 U.S. adults between 40 and 75 years of age who took part in an annual U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention…  read on >  read on >

Tens of thousands of people suffer needless heart attacks and strokes every year because they aren’t taking cholesterol-lowering drugs, a new study says. More than 39,000 deaths, nearly 100,000 non-fatal heart attacks and up to 65,000 strokes in the U.S. could be prevented if people eligible for statins and other cholesterol-lowering drugs were taking them, researchers reported June 30 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. Nearly half of Americans (47%) who’ve never had a heart attack or stroke are eligible to take statins under U.S. guidelines, researchers found. But fewer than a quarter (23%) of them have been prescribed the life-saving drugs, results show. A substantial number of heart attack or stroke survivors also aren’t taking the drugs, even though all are eligible for them under U.S. guidelines, researchers said. “These results add to a growing body of evidence that there are important shortcomings in the quality of care for common and costly chronic diseases such as high cholesterol, and that addressing those shortcomings would yield major public health benefits,” lead researcher Dr. Caleb Alexander, a professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in a news release. For the study, researchers analyzed data from nearly 5,000 U.S. adults between 40 and 75 years of age who took part in an annual U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention…  read on >  read on >

Gaiser’s European Style Provisions Inc. is recalling almost 150,000 pounds of ready-to-eat bologna due to mislabeling. The recalled lunch meats contain meat or poultry source materials that are not listed on the product labels, CBS News reports. The bologna was sold under various names and labels and was produced between March 20 and June 20 of this year. They include: Vacuum-packed packages of “FAMILY TREE BOLOGNA VEAL” (containing undeclared pork) Plastic-wrapped packages of “BABUSHKA’S RECIPE CHICKEN BOLOGNA” (undeclared pork) Plastic-wrapped packages of “FANCY BOLOGNA” (undeclared beef and chicken) Vacuum-packed packages of “GAISERS RUSSIAN BRAND DOKTORSKAYA BOLOGNA” (undeclared beef) Plastic-wrapped packages of “GAISERS BOLOGNA VEAL” (undeclared chicken and pork) Plastic-wrapped packages of “GAISERS TURKEY BOLOGNA” (undeclared chicken and pork) Plastic-wrapped packages of “CHICKEN BOLOGNA KYPOYKA PABA” (undeclared pork) These items were distributed from the Union, N.J., company to nationwide wholesale and retail locations and have establishment number “EST. 5385” inside the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspection mark on the labels. The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) received a complaint through a hotline and determined that the products contained source materials that were not declared on the label. The group does not anticipate any adverse health effects if the products are consumed, and there haven’t been any confirmed reports of illness. Still, officials are urging the public not to consume the recalled products. These products should be thrown away or…  read on >  read on >

Nestle has joined a growing list of major food companies pledging to voluntarily eliminate artificial colors from their U.S. products by the middle of next year amid mounting health concerns. “We are always looking for different ways to offer great tasting, compelling choices for our consumers,” Nestle’s U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement. “As their diverse dietary preferences and nutritional needs evolve, we evolve with them.” Nestle said 90% of its U.S. products already contain no synthetic dyes. The company has been removing them from its products for the past 10 years, it said in a statement.  Nestle’s announcement dovetails with those of other major U.S. food companies.  Kraft Heinz and General Mills previously announced plans to remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills said it plans to remove synthetic dyes from its U.S. cereals and all foods served in K-12 schools by mid-2026, and J.M Smucker Co. said it intends to remove artificial colors from its products by the end of 2027, according to media reports. Petroleum-based food dyes have been linked to a variety of health concerns, including allergies, cancer and behavioral changes.  They are synthetic color additives derived from crude oil and include artificial dyes such as Red No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5 and Blue No. 1.   The recent moves follow decades…  read on >  read on >

Nestle has joined a growing list of major food companies pledging to voluntarily eliminate artificial colors from their U.S. products by the middle of next year amid mounting health concerns. “We are always looking for different ways to offer great tasting, compelling choices for our consumers,” Nestle’s U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement. “As their diverse dietary preferences and nutritional needs evolve, we evolve with them.” Nestle said 90% of its U.S. products already contain no synthetic dyes. The company has been removing them from its products for the past 10 years, it said in a statement. Nestle’s announcement dovetails with those of other major U.S. food companies. Kraft Heinz and General Mills previously announced plans to remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills said it plans to remove synthetic dyes from its U.S. cereals and all foods served in K-12 schools by mid-2026, and J.M Smucker Co. said it intends to remove artificial colors from its products by the end of 2027, according to media reports. Petroleum-based food dyes have been linked to a variety of health concerns, including allergies, cancer and behavioral changes. They are synthetic color additives derived from crude oil and include artificial dyes such as Red No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5 and Blue No. 1. The recent moves follow decades of…  read on >  read on >

Many kids are spending a lot of unnecessary time under observation in a hospital following a sudden allergic emergency, a new study concludes. About 17% of kids are admitted for overnight observation following a scary allergic reaction to food, medicine or insect bites, researchers reported.  But 95% of children treated for allergic reactions can be safely discharged within two hours after receiving a dose of epinephrine, according to results published in The Lancet: Child and Adolescent Health. That number rises to 98% if doctors err on the side of caution and keep kids under observation for four hours, researchers found. “For most patients, we are probably observing them too long,” said researcher Dr. Kenneth Michelson, a pediatric emergency specialist at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago. “This might sound minor, but if you brought your toddler in for a scary allergic reaction, it’s the difference between going home at 11 p.m. versus going home at 1 a.m. or 3 a.m.,” he said in a news release. “Our finding gives us more confidence that after a couple of hours, if symptoms are improving in specific ways, we can probably send the child home.” Most kids who’d had an allergic reaction can be routinely treated with an epinephrine jab and sent home, researchers said in background notes. However, about 5% experience a “biphasic reaction,”…  read on >  read on >